| 112127374399_558860007582 | Russell King ARM Li |
|
Hi Russell
Thanks for your reply,
Pls find the code attached
regards..
Prafulla . .
-----Original Message-----
From: Russell King - ARM Linux [ rel="nofollow" mailto:linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx mail |
|
|   |
| 126628204484_513660007125 | Prafulla WADASKAR |
|
On Fri, 07 Jul 2006 17:50:10 +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 09:27:23AM +0530, Prafulla WADASKAR wrote:
input_unregister_device(kp- inp_dev);
/* if this |
|
|   |
| 157629974681_542460007254 | Guennadi Liakhovetsk |
|
Hi Russell
thanks for your inputs and reviews
the kernel page fault problem on re-insertion a module is solved by removing
input_free_device after unregister.
Now I am facing anther problem,
when I |
|
|   |
| 171827484161_567460007178 | Robbie |
|
Hi all,
I am using omap5912 board. I want to map the SDRAM to DSP. How to do this
in linux.
Thanks in advance
regards
Prabha J.
Tata Consultancy Services Limited
Mailto: prabha.j@xxxxxxx
Website: |
|
|   |
| 199222754624_566860007771 | James Steward |
|
|
|
|   |
| 197223624507_537060007753 | Bart Jonkers |
|
On Tue, 2006-03-28 at 09:33 -0500, Robbie wrote:
The three threads are essentially three loops performing various tasks. For all Im read I havent seen where in a RR policy a process must block or |
|
|   |
| 195222174573_543660007169 | Bart Jonkers |
|
|
|
|   |
| 156229304166_524260007837 | MarcAndrxE9 HxE9bert |
|
On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 10:51:50AM +0200, Bart Jonkers wrote:
On Fri, 2006-03-24 at 10:02 -0800, tmike@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Quoting Bart Jonkers <jonkersbart@xxxxxxxxx :
Have you loo |
|
|   |
| 149620714585_565860007331 | MarcAndrxE9 HxE9bert |
|
|
|
|   |
| 183727374607_546060007848 | MarcAndre Hebert |
|
On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 10:25:43AM -0500, Marc-Andr? H?bert wrote:
-----Message dorigine-----
De : Andy Gatward [ rel="nofollow" mailto:agatward@xxxxxxxxxxxxx mailto:agatward@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|
|   |
| 123023764210_573860007161 | MarcAndre Hebert |
|
On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 01:05:58PM -0500, Marc-Andre Hebert wrote:
Just tried that and its pumping a series of these, heres the first one I
get (I can send the next ones if it helps):
Id assume |
|
|   |
| 149026984378_506260007732 | MarcAndre Hebert |
|
On Thu, 23 Mar 2006, Marc-Andre Hebert wrote:
De : Russell King - ARM Linux [ rel="nofollow" mailto:linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx mailto:linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ]
Looks like userspace has jumped |
|
|   |
| 123226964661_539860007014 | MarcAndre Hebert |
|
On Thu, 23 Mar 2006, Marc-Andre Hebert wrote:
De : Nicolas Pitre [ rel="nofollow" mailto:nico@xxxxxxx mailto:nico@xxxxxxx ]
000b4a70 <__libc_malloc :
b4a70: e92d407 |
|
|   |
| 123524344085_582160007832 | MarcAndre Hebert |
|
On Thu, 23 Mar 2006, Marc-Andre Hebert wrote:
De : Nicolas Pitre [ rel="nofollow" mailto:nico@xxxxxxx mailto:nico@xxxxxxx ]
You could try adding cachepolicy=writethrough to your kernel c |
|
|   |
| 115229294568_575960007973 | MarcAndre Hebert |
|
On Thu, 23 Mar 2006, Marc-Andre Hebert wrote:
De : Nicolas Pitre [ rel="nofollow" mailto:nico@xxxxxxx mailto:nico@xxxxxxx ]
This means you are running your test program from either an ID |
|
|   |
| 160726204348_581860007094 | Nicolas Pitre |
|
On Thu, 23 Mar 2006, Marc-Andre Hebert wrote:
I know the ext2 fs doesnt make much sense for us, it was kept like that
mostly because that how it was.
Your truly knows that JFFS didnt exist at t |
|
|   |
| 197928484793_535660007927 | Pavel Pisa |
|
-----Message dorigine-----
De : Nicolas Pitre [ rel="nofollow" mailto:nico@xxxxxxx mailto:nico@xxxxxxx ]
Envoye : 23 mars 2006 23:09
A : Marc-Andre Hebert
Cc : Russell King - ARM Linux; |
|
|   |
| 108721434623_574960007561 | Russell King ARM Li |
|
On Fri, 24 Mar 2006, Pavel Pisa wrote:
does that mean, that this patch is required for all platforms, where
the MTD reads are used on non coherent cache systems (ARM)? If so, is it
expected to |
|
|   |
| 176327774996_584960007088 | Russell King ARM Li |
|
On Fri, 24 Mar 2006, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
However, theres a recent twist to this - the struct page in the scatter
list may not refer to the page being transferred - annoyingly, offset |
|
|   |
| 168027504017_524760007406 | James Steward |
|
On Fri, 2006-03-24 at 12:36 -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
2) and so far only for the mtdblock interface.
Please excuse my ignorance, but isnt PCMCIA to Compact Flash a
candidate? Its PIO isnt it?
|
|
|   |
| 122021154025_556860007383 | James Steward |
|
On Mon, 2006-03-27 at 09:13 +1000, James Steward wrote:
On Sun, 2006-03-26 at 06:46 +1000, James Steward wrote:
On Fri, 2006-03-24 at 12:36 -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
2) and so far |
|
|   |
| 166229124231_545460007142 | James Steward |
|
On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 11:10:32AM +1000, James Steward wrote:
More fuel for the fire, I have a couple of shell scripts that run from
cron that suddenly threw me these 2 gems...
Pid: 1854, c |
|
|   |
| 138123564285_500360007827 | Russell King ARM Li |
|
On Tue, 2006-04-04 at 09:45 +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 11:10:32AM +1000, James Steward wrote:
More fuel for the fire, I have a couple of shell scripts that r |
|
|   |
| 156528674604_556060007201 | Russell King ARM Li |
|
On Mon, 2006-04-10 at 08:53 +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 02:05:15PM +1000, James Steward wrote:
Does this agree with your theory of a bad SoC?
Its differ |
|
|   |
| 164923954951_566660007459 | Guennadi Liakhovetsk |
|
On Tue, 2006-04-11 at 14:42 +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 12:07:04PM +1000, James Steward wrote:
Well that was an interesting test...
Ive attached the first |
|
|   |
| 107128634575_509760007508 | James Steward |
|
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 10:08:17AM +1000, James Steward wrote:
Ive now hacked in a linear feedback shift register as you suggested and
in doing that has made the ramtest more explosive on the sys |
|
|   |
| 148120924420_571360007688 | James Steward |
|
|
|
|   |
| 185529284044_514060007148 | James Steward |
|
|
|
|   |
| 196724964015_557060007731 | Peter Pearse |
|
"Jason Chang" <jchang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
This is technical referece manual doc.
I mean the programming source or sample code.
There might be some examples or some test programs |
|
|   |
| 177227054126_572260007769 | Message not availabl |
|
Hi all,
FYI, the attached patch (to the debian sarge gcc-3.3 package) stops
binaries generated by gcj-3.3 from segfaulting at startup on 2.6 arm
kernels. The underlying issue is one in libgc that h |
|
|   |
| 118124424631_575660007061 | jack chen |
|
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 07:35:38AM -0600, Bill Gatliff wrote:
Since gcc 3.3 is no longer maintained, and debian sid doesnt ship
gcj-3.3 anymore, its not much use submitting bugs with either th |
|
|   |
| 126420204154_568460007701 | Peter Menzebach |
|
Peter wrote:
jack chen wrote:
Hi all :
How can i change a ramdisk that have been processed by U-boot tools "mkimage" ?
It seems that if d |
|
|   |
| 137225884628_541660007559 | Alan Casey |
|
Hi ALL:
I always set the parameter with following line :
setenv bootargs root=/dev/ram rw initrd=0x21100000,6000000 ramdisk_size=15360 ...
I know what they mean EXCEPT the |
|
|   |
| 156526954055_558060007111 | Bennett SH Wai |
|
Hi,
I want to know how process scheduling would happen in arm based system
running linux 2.4.21 kernel, specific to this example of mine.
Consider there is a processes which in a loop does only sta |
|
|   |
| 131120364817_543760007186 | x412x438x442x430x43B |
|
Le Vendredi 28 Octobre 2005 08:58, Bennett SH Wai a écrit :
I find AT91.com has changed that no Linux info is given now.
Does anyone know if 2.6.?? available for AT91RM9200? From where |
|
|   |
| 120529404629_583760007168 | Sushant Kumar Mishra |
|
|
|
|   |
| 189929614189_505260007924 | jinzhcheng |
|
hi,
I am trying to use use 2.6.13.4 kernel version for my
at91rm9200dk board.In that i have no support for
ethernet RMII.
The MII vs RMII selection is done via the is_rmii field of the
at91_e |
|
|   |
| 175320164511_538160007239 | Project TraineesEmbe |
|
On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 01:25:32PM +0000, jinzhcheng wrote:
Please read rel="nofollow" www.arm.linux.org.uk/mailinglists/etiquette.php#e2 www.arm.linux.org.uk/mailinglists/etiquette.php#e2
|
|
|   |
| 194029984935_599560007199 | Pramod P K |
|
Hello!
I want to porting Intel VFM fs to my arm board(running linux-2.4.20),
maybe somebody has do it?
在 2005-10-27四的 19:04 +0800,linux-arm-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|
|   |
| 110628894236_592360007995 | Sushant Kumar Mishra |
|
It seems the latest version of strace is not working
properly with 2.6.14. Below is a patch that fixes the
problem.
rel="nofollow" www.fluff.org/ben/patches/strace/strace-fix-arm-bad-syscall.p |
|
|   |
| 110925314935_573960007631 | Sushant Kumar Mishra |
|
|
|
|   |
| 190822664591_509660007235 | Michael Opdenacker |
|
arm-linux-gcc 2.95.3 is too old. There are major changes, so its better to
get the latest toolchain.
|
|
|   |
| 101920714252_553160007685 | Sushant Kumar Mishra |
|
Does the micro have a MMU or not?
Hi,
I want the 3.3.2 cross tool chain for arm.
From where i can download them.
regards
skm
________________________________________________ |
|
|   |
| 177123934682_570560007259 | Mathieu Deschamps |
|
Hi,
Im trying to mount USB pendrive as described at
rel="nofollow" oskfordummies.hp.infoseek.co.jp/howto/usbflash.html oskfordummies.hp.infoseek.co.jp/howto/usbflash.html
but my linux HA |
|
|   |
| 190524944148_514160007473 | Pramod P K |
|
|
|
|   |
| 113525264003_507060007371 | Aras Vaichas |
|
|
|
|   |
| 170121714637_529260007956 | Russell King ARM Li |
|
|
|
|   |
| 152722884027_577960007480 | Rodger Wilson |
|
I looked at online document and found there are low-latency patch and preemption patch for 2.4 kernel. Does anyone know if these patch are already part of 2.6.13 kernel? Does anyone actually try to m |
|
|   |
| 146425904874_514660007261 | Geoff Levand |
|
Rodger,
There was a brief discussion in Oprofile mail list regarding cross-compile
that might help you.
rel="nofollow" marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=oprofile-list&m=112967045229538&w=2 mar |
|
|   |
| 140622004755_555460007171 | Russell King ARM Li |
|
Hi All,
I am trying to figure where in the system.(arm based board, no swap etc, all
in memory, applications jffs2 based mounted partitions)
Its happening only when I am running in a specific mode a |
|
|   |